This organization files Form 990, which has no section for application policy. Its filings cannot say either way.
The latest filing we hold carries no statement about applications. That is not the same as closed: public-charity Form 990s have no field for it, and many foundations leave the section blank.
Grants paid by year
Total assets by year
Where the money went · FY2025
Form 990 splits expenses into program services, management and fundraising. The split is self-reported, and a grantmaker, a research institute and a direct-service nonprofit book the same work differently. A line the return does not carry reads "not available"; it is never counted as zero.
| Year | Form | Revenue | Expenses | Grants paid | Assets | Net assets |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FY2025 | 990 | $21,931,317 | $7,005,078 | $0 | $20,543,754 | $20,352,387 |
| FY2024 | 990 | $6,067,347 | $6,407,440 | $0 | $5,801,273 | $5,426,148 |
| FY2023 | 990 | $3,530,181 | $4,764,912 | $20,000 | $5,961,126 | $5,766,241 |
| FY2022 | 990 | $2,773,630 | $4,112,264 | $170,000 | $7,052,955 | $7,000,972 |
| FY2021 | 990 | $1,734,115 | $4,181,454 | $0 | $8,395,647 | $8,339,606 |
| FY2020 | 990 | $879,588 | $3,684,727 | $68,835 | $13,654,245 | $13,586,945 |
Figures are as reported on the e-filed return, with no restatement. Fiscal years are the funder's own tax year, labelled by the calendar year the period ends in. A blank line means the return does not carry that figure; a real zero shows as $0. When an amended return replaces an original, every figure here uses the amended return. The original is not shown. Giving is what the funder actually paid out toward its charitable purpose in the year (qualifying distributions on Form 990-PF, charitable disbursements otherwise). Assets are what it holds; giving is what moves.
Recipient focus areas
Where recipients are
Based on the 100% of grant rows we could match to an organization record. The rest stay as reported. The IRS assigns the NTEE category when it grants exemption. It often reflects the original filing, not today's giving.
| Recipient | Purpose | Amount | Year | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| JOHN JAY COLLEGENEW YORK, NY | SUBGRANT TO SUPPORT DATA SCIENCE PROJECT | $20,000 | 2022 | |
Recipients are shown as the funder wrote them on the return. A recipient with a link was matched to an organization record; the rest stay as reported and are never guessed.
| Name | Title | Hours / week | Compensation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lauren Woodman | CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER | 40.00 | $230,000 |
| Elizabeth Grossman | CHAIR OF THE BOARD | 2.00 | $0 |
| Mari Kuraishi | BOARD MEMBER | 2.00 | $0 |
| Jon Sotsky | BOARD MEMBER |
From the officer list on the latest e-filed return. Compensation is as reported there; a blank means the return carries no figure.
| SUBGRANT TO SUPPORT DATA SCIENCE PROJECT |
| $20,000 |
| 2022 |
| BRIGHT COMMUNITY TRUST INCCLEARWATER, FL | SUBGRANT TO SUPPORT DATA SCIENCE PROJECT | $20,000 | 2022 |
| CENTER ON RURAL INNOVATION INCHARTLAND, VA | SUBGRANT TO SUPPORT DATA SCIENCE PROJECT | $20,000 | 2022 |
| UNITED WAY OF SOUTH CENTRAL MICHIGANKALAMAZOO, MI | SUBGRANT TO SUPPORT DATA SCIENCE PROJECT | $20,000 | 2022 |
| COMPLETE COLLEGE AMERICA INCINDIANAPOLIS, IN | SUBGRANT TO SUPPORT DATA SCIENCE PROJECT | $20,000 | 2022 |
| GRAMEEN AMERICA INCNEW YORK, NY | DATA SCIENCE PROJECT UNDER GOOGLE.ORG FUNDING | $10,000 | 2022 |
| PROSPERITY NOWWASHINGTON, DC | GOOGLE.ORG FUNDING | $10,000 | 2023 |
| 2.00 |
| $0 |
| Zia Khan | BOARD MEMBER (UNTIL 12/24) | 2.00 | $0 |
| Rohit Chauhan | BOARD MEMBER | 2.00 | $0 |
| Erin Baudo | BOARD MEMBER (FROM 12/24) | 2.00 | $0 |
| Caitlin Augustin | VP, PRODUCT & PROGRAMS | 40.00 | $188,886 |
| Lawrence Kilroy | VP, TECHNOLOGY | 40.00 | $173,673 |
| John Harnisher | SR. DIR, PRODUCT AND PROGRAMS | 40.00 | $183,634 |
| Rachel Wells | DIR, DATA SCIENCE, EDUCATION | 40.00 | $137,797 |
| Sophia Harms | SR. MANAGER, TECHNOLOGY | 40.00 | $136,360 |
| Yash Singh | PLATFORM MNGR, U.S. COMMS PLATFORM | 40.00 | $133,998 |
| Chris Chenet | PRODUCT OWNER | 40.00 | $134,455 |
Nearest by size, location and giving pattern in the database. Geography weighs heavily. Treat it as a starting list, not a ranking of fit.