This organization files Form 990, which has no section for application policy. Its filings cannot say either way.
The latest filing we hold carries no statement about applications. That is not the same as closed: public-charity Form 990s have no field for it, and many foundations leave the section blank.
Grants paid by year
Total assets by year
Where the money went · FY2024
Form 990 splits expenses into program services, management and fundraising. The split is self-reported, and a grantmaker, a research institute and a direct-service nonprofit book the same work differently. A line the return does not carry reads "not available"; it is never counted as zero.
| Year | Form | Revenue | Expenses | Grants paid | Assets | Net assets |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FY2024 | 990 | $3,113,224 | $2,504,216 | $1,129,170 | $5,766,447 | $5,696,887 |
| FY2023 | 990 | $4,134,778 | $2,192,165 | $1,094,826 | $5,144,591 | $5,087,879 |
| FY2022 | 990 | $2,153,023 | $1,125,024 | $294,583 | $3,365,091 | $3,319,371 |
| FY2021 | 990 | $1,467,825 | $955,176 | $235,000 | $2,315,182 | $2,291,372 |
| FY2020 | 990 | $1,796,114 | $831,266 | $35,039 | $1,843,983 | $1,778,723 |
Figures are as reported on the e-filed return, with no restatement. Fiscal years are the funder's own tax year, labelled by the calendar year the period ends in. A blank line means the return does not carry that figure; a real zero shows as $0. When an amended return replaces an original, every figure here uses the amended return. The original is not shown. Giving is what the funder actually paid out toward its charitable purpose in the year (qualifying distributions on Form 990-PF, charitable disbursements otherwise). Assets are what it holds; giving is what moves.
Recipient focus areas
Where recipients are
Based on the 78% of grant rows we could match to an organization record. The rest stay as reported. The IRS assigns the NTEE category when it grants exemption. It often reflects the original filing, not today's giving.
| Recipient | Purpose | Amount | Year | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| UPROSE INCBROOKLYN, NY | ENV JUSTICE PROGRAM | $198,332 | 2024 | |
Recipients are shown as the funder wrote them on the return. A recipient with a link was matched to an organization record; the rest stay as reported and are never guessed.
| ENV JUSTICE PROGRAM |
| $186,667 |
| 2023 |
| UPROSE INCBROOKLYN, NY | ENV JUSTICE PROGRAM | $183,333 | 2023 |
| THE POINT CDCBRONX, NY | ENV JUSTICE PROGRAM | $173,333 | 2024 |
| THE POINT CDCBRONX, NY | PROGRAMS | $171,667 | 2023 |
| NY RENEWSBROOKLYN, NY | EN JUSTICE PROGRAM | $160,000 | 2024 |
| WE STAY-NOS QUEDAMOS INCBRONX, NY | ENV JUSTICE PROGRAM | $148,515 | 2024 |
| GOOD OLD LOWER EAST SIDE INCNEW YORK, NY | ENV JUSTICE PROGRAM | $143,333 | 2024 |
| EL PUENTEBROOKLYN, NY | ENV JUSTICE PROGRAM | $143,333 | 2024 |
| WE STAY-NOS QUEDAMOS INCBRONX, NY | ENV JUSTICE PROGRAM | $138,333 | 2023 |
| GOOD OLD LOWER EAST SIDE INCNEW YORK, NY | ENV JUSTICE PROGRAM | $133,333 | 2023 |
| BROOKLYN MOVEMENT CENTERBROOKLYN, NY | ENV JUSTICE PROGRAM | $133,333 | 2023 |
| UPROSE INCBROOKLYN, NY | ENV JUSTICE PROGRAM | $125,000 | 2021 |
| SUSTAINABLE CAPITAL ADVISORSWASHINGTON, DC | SUSTAINABLE PROJECT | $120,000 | 2022 |
| UPROSE INCBROOKLYN, NY | ENV JUSTICE PROGRAM | $70,000 | 2022 |
| BROOKLYN MOVEMENT CENTERBROOKLYN, NY | ENV JUSTICE PROGRAM | $66,667 | 2024 |
| THE BROTHERHOOD SISTER SOLNEW YORK, NY | ENV JUSTICE PROGRAM | $66,667 | 2024 |
| TRI-STATE TRANSPORTATION CAMPAIGNNEW YORK, NY | ENV JUSTICE PROGRAM | $58,333 | 2023 |
| ENVIRONMENTAL ADVOCATES OF NYALBANY, NY | PROGRAMS | $58,333 | 2023 |
| NY LAWYERS FOR THE PUBLIC INTERESTNEW YORK, NY | PROGRAMS | $25,000 | 2021 |
| PUSH BUFFALOBUFFALO, NY | SUSTAINABLE PROJECT | $25,000 | 2021 |
| ENVIRONMENTAL ADVOCATES OF NYALBANY, NY | PROGRAMS | $25,000 | 2021 |
| GREEN ROOTSCHELSEA, MA | PROGRAM | $20,000 | 2022 |
| CT COALITION ENVIRONMENT JUSTICEHARTFORD, CT | PROGRAM | $20,000 | 2022 |
| ALTERNATIVES FOR COMMUNITY ANDROXBURY, MA | PROGRAMS | $20,000 | 2022 |
Nearest by size, location and giving pattern in the database. Geography weighs heavily. Treat it as a starting list, not a ranking of fit.